Thursday, November 14, 2013

Discussion Post: Alternating POVs

We've all seen it. Alternating POVs. You know those books where the chapters alternate between two different people. Books like the Legend series by Marie Lu (alternates between June and Day's perspective), the Courier's Daughter series by C.J. Redwine (alternates between Rachel and Logan), and recently in Allegiant by Veronica Roth (alternates between Tris and Four). Some people hate it. Some people love it. I really like it, but only if it is done well. Writing a book this way is tricky. Each character really needs to have a distinctive voice. Normally in the chapter headers, if you're reading a book like this, it will tell you which character the chapter belongs to. Which is great and helpful. But honestly, I don't think you should need them as a reader. If the author has successfully written dual POVs it should be immediately clear whose head you are in as you are reading.


What I like about alternating POVs is being able to see both sides. I also feel like I get to know both MCs a lot better and I enjoy watching both characters develop throughout the story. I think it's a great way for authors to really allow their readers to connect with the characters and grow attached to them. It's also a great way to keep the readers informed if the two MCs are separated.  

Marie Lu does a great job of this in the Legend series. I never once questioned whose head I was in while reading the books and I got to know both June and Day so intimately. Being able to be inside both of their heads allowed me to connect with each of them and understand both of them. C.J. Redwine does a pretty good job as well in her books. There have been a couple times where I'm unsure whose head I'm in, but then a sentence or two later I go "this is definitely Rachel" because of the way she thinks, speaks, and acts. Veronica Roth tried this style of writing out in the final book in the Divergent series, Allegiant. It didn't work for me. Each character didn't have a distinct voice. I was constantly flipping back to the chapter headers to see whose head I was in because they sounded exactly the same. I think a big problem she had was that the rest of the series had only been from Tris's POV so her readers didn't really know Four. I mean, we knew him, but not intimately like we got to in the third book. We saw a side to him that I don't think most people would have guessed and it ended up being kind of a let down for me.

Those three books are examples of first person dual POVs, but what about 3rd person? It's a little easier with third person because the character's name is bound to be said soon so you don't have the confusion of whose head you're in. But what about third person omniscient? I personally am not a fan of this perspective. I think it gets too confusing to see things from everybody's perspective and it reveals everything to the reader. I like to be surprised.

So tell me, what is your favorite perspective to read from? Do you like dual POV? What are some books you've read where dual POV works and some where it hasn't?

10 comments:

  1. I actually really like alternating POVs, for the reasons you mention. I also like when the book is mostly written from the MC's POV, but you also get other characters POV as well, which can give you insight into their heads. This usually happens more in third person, like with Throne of Glass and Crown of Midnight. That way even with the strong and silent types (like Chaol) you get into his head a bit and when you do, my reaction is usually "awwwww." Falling Kingdoms is a great example of this as well, that way you can have multiple story lines going on happening in different places and you get to know the cast of characters.

    I agree, in order to do this with first person, you have to be extremely talented to write in two distinctive voices. And I do think it works better if all of the books are written that way, which is probably part of the reason it didn't work in Allegiant. That's why I'm a bit worried about The Fiery Heart by Richelle Mead, because it's book four and we're finally getting Adrian's POV. I hope it's done well!

    Great post! ~Pam

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Omg Chaol. I love him so much. Every time we would get a small snippet of his perspective in those books I swooned hardcore. Why can't he be a real person???

      I haven't read Falling Kingdoms or any of Richelle Mead's books (fail). I plan on reading both though. Eventually. Whenever I get to my massive TBR pile. Lol.

      Delete
  2. I agree--this can be a very effective technique, but only when it's done well. I really like the alternating first person POVs in the upcoming THESE BROKEN STARS, and I also think the third person alternating POVs in The Raven Boys is fantastic.

    Conversely, I wasn't a fan of the alternating first person POVs in THE SCORPIO RACES (too similar) and I really disliked the plethora of them in LINGER AND FOREVER--I felt like there were too many!

    Nice discussion post, definitely food for thought.

    Wendy @ The Midnight Garden

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I really love it when it's done well so I'm glad you said you liked it in These Broken Stars. I have an ARC of that I'm going to start reading soon and I'm super excited about it. I still need to read the Raven Boys. Heard great things.

      I also haven't read The Scorpio Races, but have heard pretty good things about it. If I read it, hopefully the POVs won't bug me too much, but I hate when two characters sound the same so...

      Thanks so much for stopping by and commenting!

      Delete
  3. So I don't mind two POV but I recently read Dearly Departed and there were about 6 and I hated it! I think if authors are going to do this they needed to be fairly unique voices/perspectives. ~sheri

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, if it gets to be too many my head wants to explode. It can just get too confusing which I think is why I'm not the biggest fan of third person omniscient. As a reader, I like to be kept in the dark about certain things and if I'm seeing through every characters' eyes then I know everything and nothing can really surprise me.

      Delete
  4. Third person Omniscient really confuses me. I usually can't get into the book. I like Alternating POV's. They actually make me feel like I'm getting an in-depth view of the main characters. A great Alternating POV book I've read recently, is Eleanor & Park by Rainbow Rowell and obviously the Legend books by Marie Lu are also awesome. Too bad you didn't enjoy the Allegiant POV's, I haven't read it yet but I'm still looking forward to it.
    -Marianne

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, I have a really hard time with most third person omniscient books. The Chronicles of Nick by Sherrilyn Kenyon are written in 3rd person omniscient and I really liked them, but other than that series, I haven't liked any other book written in third person omniscient. I have Eleanor & Park on my Kindle but haven't read it yet! I loved Fangirl though so hopefully I will love it. I'll be interested in hearing your thoughts on Allegiant once you read it. :)

      Delete
  5. I do like alternating POVs because it provides insight to what the main characters are thinking, feeling, and experiencing. I especially enjoy male perspectives, like in The Moon Dwellers by David Estes. Actually, most of his books have alternating POVs, which I like, especially in dystopian-type novels.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I love male POVs! Like Day in Legend. Love his chapters! And I love reading from Logan's POV in Defiance by C.J. Redwine. And Perry in Under the Never Sky! I haven't heard of The Moon Dwellers. I will have to check it out.

      Delete

Thank you so much for reading and commenting on my blog! I love reading comments and try to reply to every single one! So leave me a comment and if you want to talk more find me on Twitter or send me an email!